California’s Online Fundraising Rules: What the GoFundMe Dispute Means for Nonprofit Registration

What happened in the GoFundMe dispute

In March 2026, California Attorney General Rob Bonta co-led a bipartisan group of attorneys general and charity regulators in sending a public letter to GoFundMe. The regulators said the company had created donation pages for more than 1.4 million charities beginning in October 2025 without first obtaining those organizations’ knowledge or consent.

The letter raised concerns about allegedly inaccurate charity information, unclear explanations of intermediary donor-advised fund arrangements, pages that could appear affiliated with the named nonprofits, optional tips or fees, and search-engine placement that could compete with charities’ official websites. The regulators demanded evidence that unauthorized pages had been removed, clearer disclosures, a workable removal process, and information about GoFundMe’s search practices.

Those were regulatory allegations—not final judicial findings.

GoFundMe responded publicly on March 13, 2026. The company said it had removed unclaimed nonprofit pages beginning in late October 2025, had changed its process so a nonprofit page would be published only after the organization affirmatively opted in, and had blocked search-engine indexing of nonprofit pages. GoFundMe disputed some of the regulators’ legal and factual characterizations and described the disclosures and controls it said were in place.

That response is an important part of the record. So is the broader lesson: public charity data can be copied, repackaged, and placed into a donation experience much faster than most nonprofits can discover it. Once that happens, the charity may face donor confusion and reputational harm even when it did not create the page.

California had already built a stricter online fundraising framework

The GoFundMe controversy did not cause California’s core platform rules. The sequence runs the other way.

California enacted Assembly Bill 488 in 2021, bringing charitable fundraising platforms and platform charities under the Attorney General’s supervision beginning in 2023. Implementing regulations then took effect in stages during 2024 and on January 1, 2025. The disputed GoFundMe pages appeared later, in October 2025.

That chronology matters. It would be inaccurate to say California wrote a new nonprofit registration law in response to GoFundMe. The more defensible conclusion is that the incident tested a regulatory structure California had already created—and prompted the Attorney General to signal that the state expected online platforms to respect its requirements.

Under that framework, covered charitable fundraising platforms must register with the Attorney General before enabling solicitations in California, renew annually, and file annual fundraising reports. The rules also address:

• Whether charities referenced on a platform are in good standing;
• When written consent is required and what a consent agreement must contain;
• What platforms must disclose to donors before a contribution is completed;
• How quickly donation receipts must be provided;
• When donated funds must be delivered;
• What accounting information must be given to recipient charities; and
• How donors can learn whether funds reached the intended organization.

The framework places many direct duties on the platform or platform charity. But it also turns the ordinary nonprofit’s public status into an operational input. California’s rules generally prohibit platforms from soliciting, receiving, controlling, or distributing donated funds for an organization that is not in good standing.

How California’s platform rules connect to nonprofit compliance

California does not impose an absolute ban on every non-consenting listing

This is one of the most important—and most frequently missed—details in the law.

California establishes written consent as the general rule before a charitable fundraising platform or platform charity uses a recipient charity’s name in a solicitation. However, Government Code section 12599.9 also permits certain types of solicitations involving a non-consenting charity when the platform follows specific safeguards.

Among other requirements, the platform must limit the charity information it uses to specified public information, clearly disclose before the donation that the charity has not consented to the solicitation, avoid conditioning delivery of the donation on the charity’s later consent, and maintain a prompt verification and removal process.

California’s regulations define prompt verification as action no later than three business days after a written removal request. Once the request is verified, the statute provides no more than three business days for removal.

For consenting charities, the written agreement is not supposed to be a vague permission slip. California’s regulations require it to address matters such as the covered platforms, fees, delivery timing, the charity’s ability to review information presented about it, donor acknowledgments, and other terms that shape the fundraising relationship.

The result is a more nuanced rule than “a platform can never list us without permission.” A safer internal policy is: know where the organization is listed, understand whether it consented, verify that required disclosures are present, and have a ready removal procedure.

Why ordinary nonprofit registration now matters to online fundraising

An ordinary recipient nonprofit does not become a charitable fundraising platform merely because a third-party site lists it. Nor does every nonprofit using an online fundraising vendor automatically file California’s platform forms. The platform classification and the nonprofit’s underlying charity-registration duties are separate questions.

For charities subject to California registration, the baseline obligations remain significant:

• Initial registration: California states that a charitable organization must generally register with the Attorney General within 30 days of first receiving charitable assets. For an organization formed outside California, the state’s guidance treats active solicitation targeting California residents as a form of doing business that can bring the organization within the registration framework.
• Annual renewal: Registered charities generally file Form RRF-1 with the applicable fee and either the relevant IRS Form 990-series return or Form CT-TR-1, depending on the organization’s federal filing.
• Due date: The normal deadline is four months and 15 days after the close of the fiscal year. California honors qualifying IRS extensions.
• Complete records: A filing that is missing the required fee or supporting return may result in an incomplete reporting status rather than a clean renewal.

California provided broad filing relief while transitioning charities to a new online filing service in 2026. For renewal filings otherwise due from January 7, 2025 through August 31, 2026, the state extended the deadline to August 31, 2026. That relief period has now ended. Organizations that relied on the extension should confirm that submissions were complete, accepted, and reflected correctly in the Registry—not merely uploaded or left in draft status.

The state publishes a “May Not Operate or Solicit for Charitable Purposes” list twice each month and also maintains a Registry Search Tool with current status information. California says the real-time search result controls when it differs from the periodic list for purposes of determining a charity’s current standing.

This makes status increasingly visible and usable. A problem that once might have sat unnoticed in a filing folder can now surface during a platform eligibility check, due-diligence review, grant process, or donor search.

The real increase is in consequence, not simply paperwork

The most consequential feature of California’s approach is not a new form imposed on every nonprofit after the GoFundMe dispute. It is the way the state connects existing charity registration records to the systems through which donations move.

If a nonprofit is shown as delinquent, suspended, revoked, or otherwise prohibited from operating or soliciting, the organization may face penalties and other state consequences. Under the platform rules, that same status can also prevent covered platforms from continuing to solicit or transmit donations for the organization. Depending on the solicitation type and circumstances, funds that cannot be sent to an ineligible recipient may be directed through the statutory process to an alternate eligible charity.

That changes the risk calculation. A missed renewal is no longer only an administrative defect to repair later. It may become a fundraising continuity issue.

A practical California action plan for nonprofit leaders

1. Verify all three layers of standing. Check the nonprofit’s status with the California Attorney General, California Franchise Tax Board, and IRS. Do not assume that good standing with one agency resolves the others.
2. Confirm the filing—not just the submission. Review the online account for drafts, notices, “Action Required” items, missing supporting documents, and payments. Compare the account with the public Registry record.
3. Inventory the organization’s online fundraising footprint. Search the legal name, former names, common abbreviations, campaign names, and EIN across major fundraising platforms and search engines. Save screenshots and URLs of anything the organization did not create.
4. Designate who may authorize a platform. Limit approval rights to named roles, document who accepted each agreement, and preserve the version of the terms in effect when consent was given.
5. Review the entire donation path. Identify the legal recipient, any donor-advised fund or other intermediary, platform fees, optional tips, expected delivery date, donor receipt issuer, donor-data terms, and process for restricted gifts.
6. Create a removal and correction procedure. Keep proof of authority and the organization’s legal identifiers readily available. Document each request, verification response, correction, removal, and follow-up search.
7. Connect California to the national registration map. The GoFundMe letter was multistate, and a digital campaign can reach donors far beyond California. Review where the organization actively targets solicitations and where registration or an exemption may apply.
8. Recheck before major campaigns. Verify public status and platform settings before Giving Tuesday, year-end fundraising, disaster appeals, peer-to-peer launches, or paid digital campaigns—when a last-minute interruption would be most damaging.

RegiSTAR-US analysis: registration is becoming distribution permission

The conventional view of state registration is too narrow. A nonprofit files because the law requires it, receives a confirmation, and repeats the process next year.

California’s model points toward a more integrated future. Government registries are becoming data sources that fundraising platforms can use to decide which organizations may be displayed, supported, or paid. Consent records determine who may use a charity’s identity and on what terms. Platform disclosures determine what donors believe they are funding. Together, these controls shape whether money can move from a donor to the intended organization.

Our analysis is straightforward: a nonprofit’s compliance record is becoming part of its fundraising supply chain.

That does not mean every web reference, platform page, or online contribution automatically creates a registration obligation in every state. Registration analysis still depends on the organization’s activities, the audience being targeted, applicable exemptions, and each state’s law.

It does mean nonprofits need one connected view of three records:

• The registration record: where the organization is registered, exempt, pending, delinquent, or restricted;
• The platform record: where its identity appears, who authorized the relationship, and what the governing terms say; and
• The campaign record: where solicitations are directed, what donors are told, and how funds reach the organization.

When those records agree, a nonprofit is in a much stronger position to protect its name, maintain donor trust, and keep fundraising active. When they do not, the first warning may arrive as a missing payment, a donor complaint, a platform restriction, or a regulator’s notice.

How RegiSTAR-US helps

RegiSTAR-US helps nonprofits evaluate their charitable solicitation footprint, prepare initial state registrations, manage annual renewals, monitor public status, and resolve filing gaps before they interrupt fundraising.

Organizations reviewing California activity can start with our California charitable solicitation registration guide, use our state compliance status resources, or request a free compliance review.

Frequently asked questions